In construction insurance, risk transfer isn’t just a technicality. It’s a cornerstone of protecting all parties involved. For brokers and their clients, navigating indemnity agreements and additional insured requirements often feels like stepping into a legal maze.
We’re often asked by our retail and wholesale partners: “What do underwriters look for in a contract to ensure proper risk transfer?”
While we’re not attorneys and can’t provide legal advice, we work closely with our partners to spot potential gaps and guide them toward legal counsel experienced in this area.
Why?
Because state laws and anti-indemnity statutes can vary widely, getting state-specific advice is essential.
Here’s a high-level overview of how indemnity and additional insured requirements work together, and what underwriters typically evaluate. (If I got into the nitty gritty, we’d be here for a long time!)
The Hierarchy of Risk Transfer
Risk in construction projects tends to flow downstream. Each party seeks to shift exposure to those performing work:
This hierarchy relies on well-constructed contracts and adequate insurance coverage to function as intended.
"Risk transfer isn’t just a technicality. It’s the cornerstone of protecting your clients in construction insurance."
Understanding Indemnity Agreements
An indemnity agreement is a contract where one party (the indemnitor) assumes responsibility for potential losses, defending and holding harmless another party (the indemnitee).
But indemnity provisions aren’t one-size-fits-all:
*Or its equivalent, such as CG 20 10 10/01 and CG 20 37 10/1 AI forms.
Why Additional Insured Coverage Matters
AI endorsements complement indemnity provisions by extending coverage to upstream parties. Common forms underwriters look for include:
The choice of form—and how it interacts with the indemnity agreement and local case law—can have a significant impact when claims arise.
"Knowing which additional insured forms apply—and how they interact with indemnity language—can make all the difference when a claim hits."
Action Over Claims: A Hidden Exposure
Part of the risk transfer world is action over lawsuits, which present a unique risk in construction:
Because this tort liability is indirect via an indemnification obligation, it can bypass WC exclusivity and result in a general liability (GL) loss for the subcontractor (i.e., the employer of the injured worker); this is the action over part. Strong contracts and vigilant monitoring are critical to mitigating this exposure.
What Underwriters Look For
When evaluating contracts and additional insured requirements, we focus on these key elements:
✅ Insurance Limits
✅ Contract Language
✅ Certificate Monitoring
*The AI coverage is often negotiated to CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 10/01 editions, which could also extend the sole negligence of the additional insured, depending on the underlying facts and applicable case law.
The Bottom Line: Strong Contracts Mean Strong Protection
Risk transfer in construction is complex, and no two projects are alike. By understanding the interplay between indemnity agreements, additional insured endorsements and jurisdictional nuances, brokers can help their clients structure contracts that truly protect them.
We encourage all parties to seek legal counsel with expertise in construction contracts, and to partner with carriers who know what to look for.